Do statistical laws have explanatory efficacy?

Philosophy of Science 22 (1):34-38 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In "Studies In The Logic Of Explanation" (Philosophy of Science, XV, 1948) Hempel and Oppenheim analyze the basic pattern of scientific explanation. One of the difficult problems which they acknowledge is "whether and how the analysis of explanation can be extended from the case where all general ex- planatory principles invoked are of a strictly universal or 'deterministic' form to the case where explanatory reference is made to statistical hypotheses." It is hoped that the remarks which follow may contribute a little toward clarifying the issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nomic dependence and causation.F. John Clendinnen - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (3):341-360.
Statistical relevance and explanatory classification.John L. King - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (5):313 - 321.
Laws and statistical mechanics.Eric Winsberg - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):707-718.
On an information-theoretic model of explanation.James Woodward - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):21-44.
Theoretical modeling and biological laws.Gregory Cooper - 1996 - Philosophy of Science 63 (3):35.
Statistical explanation and ergodic theory.Lawrence Sklar - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (2):194-212.
Foundations of statistical mechanics—two approaches.Stephen Leeds - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#139,153)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Deductive chauvinism.Henrik Hållsten - 1999 - Synthese 120 (1):49-59.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references