O'Hear on an argument of Popper's

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):375-377 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/35.4.375

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,853

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

In defense of the Popper-Miller argument.Donald Gillies - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):110-113.
Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems.A. O' Hear (ed.) - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
A suspicious feature of the popper/miller argument.I. J. Good - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (3):535-536.
Rationality of Action and Theory-Testing in Popper.A. O'hear - 1975 - Mind 84 (1):273-276.
How Popper [might have] solved the problem of induction.Alan Musgrave - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (1):19-31.
The open society revisited.Anthony O'Hear - 2004 - In Philip Catton & Graham Macdonald (eds.), Karl Popper: Critical Appraisals. Routledge.
Criticism and Tradition in Popper, Oakeshott and Hayek.Anthony O'hear - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):65-75.
Karl Popper.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 1980 - Boston: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#737,450)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Reply to Glassen.Anthony O'hear - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):377-380.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Karl Popper.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 1980 - Boston: Routledge.

Add more references