Reply to Glassen

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):377-380 (1984)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Moore and the indefinability of good.Peter Glassen - 1958 - Journal of Philosophy 55 (10):430-435.
Thalberg on immateriality.Peter Glassen - 1984 - Mind 93 (372):566-569.
The senses of “ought”.Peter Glassen - 1960 - Philosophical Studies 11 (1-2):10 - 16.
“Charientic” Judgments.Peter Glassen - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (125):138-.
Some Questions about Relations.P. Glassen - 1956 - Analysis 17 (3):64-68.
Smart, Materialism and Believing.Peter Glassen - 1983 - Philosophy 58 (223):95 - 101.
A fallacy in aristotle’s argument about the good.P. Glassen - 1957 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (29):319-322.
O'Hear on an argument of Popper's.Peter Glassen - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):375-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#162,080)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anthony O'hear
University of Buckingham

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Karl Popper.Anthony O'Hear (ed.) - 1980 - Boston: Routledge.
The Open Universe.Karl R. Popper - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):651-656.
O'Hear on an argument of Popper's.Peter Glassen - 1984 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):375-377.

Add more references