Heterarchies of Value in Manhattan-Based New Media Firms

Theory, Culture and Society 20 (3):77-105 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article develops a sociology of worth that blurs the traditional disciplinary divide between economic value and social values. Through ethnographic study of a new media startup in Manhattan's Silicon Alley, we examine how a new firm in an emerging industry negotiates an uncertain environment where metrics gauging performance remain illusive as the industry itself gropes toward a clearer definition of its content and contours. Faced with complex foresight horizons, new media firms must develop an organizational capacity for learning, innovation, and flexible adaptation to constantly changing requirements. We examine how the clash of evaluative criteria guiding the work of cross-disciplinary project teams becomes a source for innovation and a resource for learning when deliberation across evaluative principles is combined with an organizational and administrative structure that relies on lateral accountability.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,438

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The reciprocal and non-linear relationship of sustainability and financial performance.Marcus Wagner & Joris Blom - 2011 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 20 (4):418-432.
Oligopoly equilibria when firms have local knowledge of demand.Giacomo Bonanno - 1988 - International Economic Review 29 (1):45-55.
Casuistry: Case-based Reasoning for the Ethical Journalist.Janie Harden Fritz - 2011 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (1):88-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
27 (#578,323)

6 months
22 (#119,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Sociology of Critical Capacity.Laurent Thévenot & Luc Boltanski - 1999 - European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3):359-377.

Add more references