The Man on the Dump versus the United Dames of America; Or, What Does Frank Lentricchia Want?

Critical Inquiry 14 (2):386-406 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

That the pattern into which Lentricchia seeks to assimilate Stevens is politically charged becomes clearest when we turn to the following oddly incomprehensible statement: “In the literary culture that Stevens would create, the ‘phallic’ would not have been the curse word of some recent feminist criticism but the name of a limited, because male, respect for literature” . At the point where he makes this assertion, Lentricchia has been persuasively demonstrating that Stevens was “encouraged … to fantasize the potential social authority of the literary as phallic authority” . But suddenly the critic’s measured discourse is disrupted by obviously personal feelings about the “curse word of some recent feminist criticism” and by a dazzlingly illogical definition of “respect for literature.” Such a disruption suggests that, in making his apparently objective argument about Stevens, Lentricchia has some other not so hidden agenda—and, of course, his peculiar decision to link his discussion of Stevens with an attack on The Madwoman in the Attic further supports this conclusion. What most strikingly reinforces the point, however, is the hysterical—or perhaps, with some recent feminist linguists, we should say “testerical”—rhetoric in which he couches his assault on our work.14 14. The term “testeria,” for male “hysteria,” is proposed by Juli Loesch in “Testeria and Penisolence—A Scourge to Humankind,” Aphra: The Feminist Literary Magazine, 4, 1 : 43-45; quoted in Casey Miller and Kate Swift, Words and Women: New Language in New Times , pp. 60-61. Sandra M. Gilbert, professor of English at Princeton University, and Susan Gubar, professor of English at Indiana University, are coauthors of No Man’s Land: The Place of the Woman Writer in the Twentieth Century, Volume I: The War of the Words , the first installment of a three-part sequel to their Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination . They have also coedited The Norton Anthology of Literature by Women: The Tradition in English

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Andiamo!Frank Lentricchia - 1988 - Critical Inquiry 14 (2):407-413.
The place of Cleanth Brooks.Frank Lentricchia - 1970 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29 (2):235-251.
Four types of nineteenth-century poetic.Frank Lentricchja - 1968 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (3):351-366.
Coleridge and Emerson: Prophets of silence, prophets of language.Frank Lentricchia - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):37-46.
Anachronistic Reading.J. Hillis Miller - 2010 - Derrida Today 3 (1):75-91.
Food reinforcement versus social reinforcement in timber wolf pups.Martha G. Frank & Harry Frank - 1988 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (5):467-468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
24 (#642,030)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references