Love of humanity in Shaftesbury’s Moralists

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (6):1117-1135 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Shaftesbury believed that the height of virtue was impartial love for all of humanity. But Shaftesbury also harboured grave doubts about our ability to develop such an expansive love. In The Moralists, Shaftesbury addressed this problem. I show that while it may appear on the surface that The Moralists solves the difficulty, it in fact remains unresolved. Shaftesbury may not have been able to reconcile his view of the content of virtue with his view of our motivational psychology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hutcheson's Divergence from Shaftesbury.Simon Grote - 2006 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (2):159-172.
Shaftesbury and the Modern Problem of Virtue.Douglas J. Den Uyl - 1998 - Social Philosophy and Policy 15 (1):275.
British References to Shaftesbury 1700-1800.Chester Chapin - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:315-329.
The british moralists on human nature and the birth of secular ethics. (Review).Laurent Jaffro - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2):pp. 323-324.
Decent conduct toward animals: A traditional approach.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1999 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):61-83.
British References to Shaftesbury 1700-1800.Chester Chapin - 1987 - Philosophy Research Archives 13:315-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-23

Downloads
33 (#481,697)

6 months
11 (#232,073)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael B. Gill
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Catharine Trotter Cockburn’s Democratization of Moral Virtue.Getty L. Lustila - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (1):83-97.
Shaftesbury on the Beauty of Nature.Michael B. Gill - 2021 - Journal of Modern Philosophy 3 (1):1.

Add more citations