Children's rights, parental agency and the case for non-coercive responses to care drain

In Diana Meyers (ed.), Poverty, Agency, and Human Rights. Oxford University Press (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Worldwide, many impoverished parents migrate, leaving their children behind. As a result children are deprived of continuity in care and, sometimes, suffer from other forms of emotional and developmental harms. I explain why coercive responses to care drain are illegitimate and likely to be inefficient. Poor parents have a moral right to migrate without their children and restricting their migration would violate the human right to freedom of movement and create a new form of gender injustice. I propose and defend an institutional solution. Taxes levied on the remittances sent by temporary migrants ought to be used to provide migrants' children with psychological counselling in order to mitigate the harm resulted from discontinuity in care.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Care drain: who should provide for the children left behind?Anca Gheaus - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):1-23.
Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
Arguments for Nonparental Care for Children.Anca Gheaus - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (3):483-509.
A Duty to Adopt?Daniel Friedrich - 2013 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (1):25-39.
Parents, Adolescents, and Consent for Research Participation.A. S. Iltis - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):332-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
817 (#18,515)

6 months
83 (#57,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Anca Gheaus
Central European University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations