What is democratic reliability? Epistemic theories of democracy and the problem of reasonable disagreement

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):218-241 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/13698230.2015.1129489

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.
Epistemic theories of democracy, constitutionalism and the procedural legitimacy of fundamental rights.Yann Allard-Tremblay - 2012 - Dissertation, University of St Andrews
Moral Disagreement in a Democracy.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1995 - Social Philosophy and Policy 12 (1):87-110.
Democracy and ignorance: Reply to Friedman.Robert B. Talisse - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (4):453-466.
The epistemic value of the democratic process.William Nelson - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 19-32.
Democratic legitimacy and proceduralist social epistemology.Fabienne Peter - 2007 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (3):329-353.
How to make the generality problem work for you.Christopher Lepock - 2009 - Acta Analytica 24 (4):275-286.
Problems in the Theory of Democratic Authority.Christopher S. King - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):431 - 448.
An epistemic defense of democracy: David Estlund's democratic authority.Elizabeth Anderson - 2008 - Episteme 5 (1):pp. 129-139.
Calibrated probabilities and the epistemology of disagreement.Barry Lam - 2013 - Synthese 190 (6):1079-1098.
Vector reliability: A new approach to epistemic justification.Mark E. Wunderlich - 2003 - Synthese 136 (2):237 - 262.
Through “Thick” and “Thin”: Concerns about Talisse's Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. [REVIEW]Mark H. van Hollebeke - 2009 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45 (1):80-89.
Waldron on law and disagreement.Thomas Christiano - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):513-543.
Epistemic Foundations of Political Liberalism.Fabienne Peter - 2013 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (5):598-620.
Why Deliberative Democracy is Different.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 2000 - Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (1):161.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
53 (#293,652)

6 months
14 (#170,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Democratic epistemology and democratic morality: the appeal and challenges of Peircean pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):432-453.
Democracy and Truth: A Contingent Defense of Epistemic Democracy.Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (1):49-71.
Democratic epistemology and democratic morality: the appeal and challenges of Peircean pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):432-453.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
The idea of justice.Amartya Sen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The ethical project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references