What is democratic reliability? Epistemic theories of democracy and the problem of reasonable disagreement

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21 (2):218-241 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/13698230.2015.1129489

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Democracy, respect for judgement and disagreement on democratic inclusion.Jonas Hultin Rosenberg - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):506-527.
Liberal legitimacy, reasonable disagreement and justice.Simon Caney - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):19-36.
Disagreement without reconciliation: Democracy, equality and the public realm.Benjamin Arditi - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2):167-181.
Reasonable Pluralism and the Procedure-Independent Standard in Epistemic Democracy.W. Mittendorf - 2023 - In Ingolf U. Dalferth & Marlene A. Block (eds.), Autonomy, Diversity and the Common Good. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 231-240.
An epistemic case for confucian democracy.Elena Ziliotti - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (7):1005-1027.
What militant democrats and technocrats share.Anthoula Malkopoulou - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (4):437-460.
Political Discourse and Reasonable Disagreement - What Constitutionalism Suggests.Valerio Fabbrizi - 2019 - In Dejana M. Vukasovic & Petar Matic (eds.), Diskurs I Politika - Discourse and Politics. pp. 99-121.
Disagreement and epistemic arguments for democracy.Sean Ingham - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):136-155.
Voting turnout, equality, liberty and representation: epistemic versus procedural democracy.Lisa Hill - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (3):283-300.
Critical problems and pragmatist solutions.Felix Petersen, Hauke Brunkhorst & Martin Seeliger - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (10):1341-1352.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
59 (#266,043)

6 months
18 (#191,063)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Democratic epistemology and democratic morality: the appeal and challenges of Peircean pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):432-453.
Democratic epistemology and democratic morality: the appeal and challenges of Peircean pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4):432-453.
Democracy and Truth: A Contingent Defense of Epistemic Democracy.Gustavo Hessmann Dalaqua - 2017 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 29 (1):49-71.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Philosophical explanations.Robert Nozick - 1981 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
The idea of justice.Amartya Sen - 2009 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
The ethical project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references