Thomistic Rebuttal of Some Common Objections to Paley's Argument From Design

New Blackfriars 97 (1067):266-288 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Paley’s Argument for Design.Graham Oppy - 2002 - Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Paley’s Inductive Inference to Design.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):491-502.
Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance.Bill Spencer - 2006 - Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 48 (2-3):62 - 65.
Design Arguments: A Re-Evaluation.David Nathan Kessler - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
The argument for design.R. G. Swinburne - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 199-.
The argument from design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
William Paley's Lost "Intelligent Design".Adam R. Shapiro - 2009 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31 (1):55 - 77.
Intelligent Design: The Original Version.Francisco J. Ayala - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (1):9-32.
Teleology.André Ariew - 2007 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.
Design and its discontents.Bruce H. Weber - 2011 - Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-11-09

Downloads
21 (#738,616)

6 months
3 (#979,100)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marie I. George
St. John's University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references