The Everlasting Check: Hume on Miracles

Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Alexander George’s lucid interpretation of Hume’s “Of Miracles” provides fresh insights into this provocative text, explaining the concepts and claims involved. He also shows why Hume’s argument fails to engage with committed religious thought and why philosophical argumentation so often proves ineffective in shaking people’s deeply held beliefs.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Everlasting Check: Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (4):680-681.
Hume’s Abject Failure. [REVIEW]John Goyette - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (3):625-627.
The Everlasting Check: Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Daniel E. Flage - 2016 - Review of Metaphysics 70 (1):129-131.
The Everlasting Check: Hume on Miracles. By Alexander George. [REVIEW]Ryan Cobb - 2017 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):317-319.
Hume on Miracles.Yann Schmitt - 2012 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 17 (1):49-71.
A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW]Richard Otte - 2005 - Hume Studies 31 (1):165-168.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Contrary miracles concluded.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1985 - Hume Studies 1985 (Supplement):1 - 14.
Bayes, Hume, Price, and Miracles.John Earman - 2002 - In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Bayes’s Theorem. Oxford University Press. pp. 91--110.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-30

Downloads
25 (#630,588)

6 months
4 (#778,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander George
Amherst College

Citations of this work

Como Ser um Naturalista Filosófico Responsável?Luis R. G. Oliveira - 2017 - Revista Brasileira de Filosofia da Religião 4 (1):9-25.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references