Notes: A New Gettier-Type Refutation of Nozick´s Analysis of Knowledge

Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 8 (2):279–283 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Discussion: A New Gettier-Type Refutation of Nozick´s Analysis of Knowledge.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-Pickwickian Belief and 'the Gettier Problem'.John Biro - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (1):47-69.
What Should a Theory of Knowledge Do?Elijah Chudnoff - 2011 - Dialectica 65 (4):561-579.
Are Gettier Cases Misleading?Philip Atkins - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (3):379-384.
Knowledge, Noise, and Curve-Fitting: A methodological argument for JTB?Jonathan M. Weinberg - 2017 - In Rodrigo Borges, Claudio de Almeida & Peter David Klein (eds.), Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Why Gettier Cases are misleading.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - Logos and Episteme 7 (1):31-44.
Living in the Gettier Fallout.Todd Michael Furman - 1992 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Gettier Cases and Normal Reasoners.Carlos García - 2007 - Ideas Y Valores 56 (135):77–88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
50 (#316,633)

6 months
1 (#1,461,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references