What's so special about Kruskal's theorem and the ordinal Γo? A survey of some results in proof theory

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 53 (3):199-260 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper consists primarily of a survey of results of Harvey Friedman about some proof-theoretic aspects of various forms of Kruskal's tree theorem, and in particular the connection with the ordinal Γ0. We also include a fairly extensive treatment of normal functions on the countable ordinals, and we give a glimpse of Verlen hierarchies, some subsystems of second-order logic, slow-growing and fast-growing hierarchies including Girard's result, and Goodstein sequences. The central theme of this paper is a powerful theorem due to Kruskal, the ‘tree theorem’, as well as a ‘finite miniaturization’ of Kruskal's theorem due to Harvey Friedman. These versions of Kruskal's theorem are remarkable from a proof-theoretic point of view because they are not provable in relatively strong logical systems. They are examples of so-called ‘natural independence phenomena’, which are considered by most logicians as more natural than the metamathematical incompleteness results first discovered by Gödel. Kruskal's tree theorem also plays a fundamental role in computer science, because it is one of the main tools for showing that certain orderings on trees are well founded. These orderings play a crucial role in proving the termination of systems of rewrite rules and the correctness of Knuth-Bendix completion procedures. There is also a close connection between a certain infinite countable ordinal called Γo and Kruskal's theorem. Previous definitions of the function involved in this connection are known to be incorrect, in that, the function is not monotonic. We offer a repaired definition of this function, and explore briefly the consequences of its existence.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proof-theoretic investigations on Kruskal's theorem.Michael Rathjen & Andreas Weiermann - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 60 (1):49-88.
An intuitionistic proof of Kruskal’s theorem.Wim Veldman - 2004 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 43 (2):215-264.
Complexity Bounds for Some Finite Forms of Kruskal's Theorem.Andreas Weiermann - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):588-590.
A comparison of well-known ordinal notation systems for ε0.Gyesik Lee - 2007 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 147 (1):48-70.
A Mathematical Commitment Without Computational Strength.Anton Freund - 2022 - Review of Symbolic Logic 15 (4):880-906.
Generalizing Kruskal’s theorem to pairs of cohabitating trees.Timothy Carlson - 2016 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (1-2):37-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-19

Downloads
8 (#1,345,183)

6 months
3 (#1,046,015)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Systems of predicative analysis.Solomon Feferman - 1964 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 29 (1):1-30.
[product]¹2-logic, Part 1: Dilators.Jean-Yves Girard - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 21 (2):75.
Π12-logic, Part 1: Dilators.Jean-Yves Girard - 1981 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 21 (2-3):75-219.
On the restricted ordinal theorem.R. L. Goodstein - 1944 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):33-41.

View all 9 references / Add more references