Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (1):40-62 (2012)
AbstractThe following analysis demonstrates that G.H. Mead's understanding of human speech is remarkably consistent with today's interdisciplinary field that studies speech as a natural behavior with an evolutionary history. Mead seems to have captured major empirical and theoretical insights more than half a century before the contemporary field began to take shape. In that field the framework known as “Tinbergen's Four Questions,” developed in ecology to study naturally occurring behavior in nonhuman animals, has been an effective organizing framework for research on human speech. It is used in this paper to organize the comparison of Mead with contemporary scholars. The analysis concludes that Mead was, in a sense, “beyond” the Four Questions by recognizing the limitations of reductionist methods in understanding the nature of conscious phenomena, especially language. Mead's socially situated model of the nature of human speech makes him relevant to today's field where some see an undervaluation of the treatment of language as a social process
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
The Social Nature of Self and Morality for Husserl, Schutz, Marx, and Mead.William M. O’Meara - 1986 - Philosophy Research Archives 12:329-355.
Mead, Intersubjectivity, and Education: The Early Writings. [REVIEW]Gert J. J. Biesta - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):73-99.
Mead and the International Mind.Marilyn Fischer - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 508-531.
The Evolution of the Psychical Element: George Herbert Mead at the University of Chicago: Lecture Notes by H. Heath Bawden 1899–1900: Introduction. [REVIEW]Kevin S. Decker - 2008 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (3):pp. 469-479.
G.H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-Examination of His Thought.Hans Joas - 1985 - Cambridge: MIT Press.
The Loss of Nature in Axel Honneth's Social Philosophy. Rereading Mead with Merleau-Ponty.Jean-Philippe Deranty - 2005 - Critical Horizons 6 (1):153-181.
A Self-Regulation Model of Inner Speech and its Role in the Organisation of Human Conscious Experience.Robert Clowes - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):59-71.
Mead has Never Been Modern: Using Meadian Theory to Extend the Constructionist Study of Technology.Antony J. Puddephatt - 2005 - Social Epistemology 19 (4):357 – 380.
The Dogma of Isomorphism: A Case Study From Speech Perception.Irene Appelbaum - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (3):S250-S259.
References found in this work
Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again.Andy Clark - 1981 - MIT Press.
Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind.Gerald M. Edelman - 1992 - Penguin Books.
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature.Steven Pinker - 2002 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (4):765-767.
Citations of this work
Human-Animal Studies, G.H. Mead, and the Question of Animal Minds.Timothy J. Gallagher† - 2016 - Society and Animals 24 (2):153-171.