Detection, not perception: A reply to Glazer

Philosophical Psychology 31 (7):1120-1125 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article responds to Glazer’s claim that signals must be perceptible as well as his purported counterexample to my conditions for signaling. I defend a broader sense of signal detection that allows for imperceptible signals. While we disagree over the belief-signaling thesis, Glazer and I have great agreement over the social functions of belief.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deceiving oneself about being in control: Conscious detection of changes in visuomotor coupling.G. Knoblich & T. T. J. Kircher - 2004 - Journal of Experimental Psychology - Human Perception and Performance 30 (4):657-66.
On Glazer and Rubinstein on persuasion.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - In Krzysztof R. Apt & Robert van Rooij (eds.), New Perspectives on Games and Interactions. Amsterdam University Press.
Reply to Ganson.Mark Eli Kalderon - forthcoming - In Lagerlund Henrik & Yrjönsuuri Mikko (eds.), Mechanisms of Sense perception. Springer.
Coherence detection: A basic mechanism.Albert S. Rodwan - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (1):57.
Change Detection.Ronald A. Rensink - 2002 - Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1):245-277.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-27

Downloads
36 (#403,339)

6 months
7 (#243,727)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Funkhouser
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

References found in this work

Beliefs as signals: A new function for belief.Eric Funkhouser - 2017 - Philosophical Psychology 30 (6):809-831.
Are beliefs signals?Trip Glazer - 2018 - Philosophical Psychology 31 (7):1114-1119.

Add more references