An expanded “staying alive” theory (SAT) underplays complexity in Homo sapiens

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target article takes myriad human female patterns and aligns them as a unit emerging from an expanded version of “staying alive” theory. Females and males do differ, however, to treat the complexity of human response to threats as an explicit, evolved sexually dimorphic package is not reflective of current knowledge regarding health, sex/gender, and behavior in Homo sapiens.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Homo Technologicus: Threat or Opportunity?Kevin Warwick - 2016 - Philosophies 1 (3):199--208.
From Homo Sapiens to Homo Cogitans.Şeyma Şirin - 2020 - Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review 4 (1):95-103.
El homo sapiens sapiens especie poco protegida.Agustín González Gallego - 2007 - Thémata: Revista de Filosofía 39:51-58.
Plio-pleistocene Hominids: Epistemological and Taxonomic Problems.Jolanta Koszteyn - 1970 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 9 (1):169-202.
Technologies and Species Transitions: Polanyi, on a Path to Posthumanity?Robert Doede - 2011 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 31 (3):225-235.
Homo Sapiens as a Model Maker.J. Samuel Bois - 1974 - In Donald E. Washburn & Dennis R. Smith (eds.), Coping with increasing complexity: implications of general semantics and general systems theory. New York: Gordon & Breach. pp. 82.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-26

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
5 (#627,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references