Self-organised criticality—what it is and what it isn’t

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):613-632 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The last decade and a half has seen an ardent development of self-organised criticality, a new approach to complex systems, which has become important in many domains of natural as well as social science, such as geology, biology, astronomy, and economics, to mention just a few. This has led many to adopt a generalist stance towards SOC, which is now repeatedly claimed to be a universal theory of complex behaviour. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, I provide a brief and non-technical introduction to SOC. Second, I critically discuss the various bold claims that have been made in connection with it. Throughout, I will adopt a rather sober attitude and argue that some people have been too readily carried away by fancy contentions. My overall conclusion will be that none of these bold claims can be maintained. Nevertheless, stripped of exaggerated expectations and daring assertions, many SOC models are interesting vehicles for promising scientific research.Author Keywords: Self-organised criticality; Scaling law; Models; Formal analogy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,897

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dreams, mnemonics, and tuning for criticality.Barak A. Pearlmutter & Conor J. Houghton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (6):625-626.
Reconstruction in Criticality.Andrés Mejía D. - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (1):17-31.
Criticality is perilous.Kareen Malone - 2011 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 31 (3):200-204.
Reconstruction in Criticality.D. Andrés Mejía - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (1):17-31.
Introduction to the Special Issue on The Social Dimension of Critical Thinking.Mary Vasudeva & Stuart Keeley - 2004 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 23 (3):4-4.
Self-Reflective Synergetics.Helena Knyazeva - 2003 - Systems Research and Behavioral Science 20 (1):53-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
137 (#135,017)

6 months
9 (#308,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Roman Frigg
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Explaining Financial Markets in Terms of Complex Systems.Meinard Kuhlmann - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (5):1117-1130.
Econophysics for philosophers.Dean Rickles - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (4):948-978.
Modelling and knowledge transfer in complexity science.Lena Zuchowski - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 77:120-129.
How models represent.James Nguyen - 2016 - Dissertation,

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How the laws of physics lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1963 - [Notre Dame, Ind.]: University of Notre Dame Press.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary Hesse - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (62):161-163.
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91-196.

View all 18 references / Add more references