Abstract

This essay reviews four longer arguments regarding the status of critical thinking on psychology. The commentary understands criticality as somehow sitting at the edge of theory itself. Given Psychology's perpetual identity crisis, the question of its edges and thus where criticality should nibble is brought to bear on the basic premises of the paper. Two of the papers are addressed in terms of the implied metapsychology they would presuppose and where that might break down . Two essays are addressed in terms of being a form of reading: one founded in adumbrations of desire and the other in a faith in science. The authors are asked if their work might not be informed by recent trends philosophy of science and through particular psychoanalytic lenses. 2012 APA, all rights reserved)