Can mathematics be formalized?

Abstract

It has been accepted since the early part of the Century that there is no problem formalizing mathematics in standard formal systems of axiomatic set theory. Most people feel that they know as much as they ever want to know about how one can reduce natural numbers, integers, rationals, reals, and complex numbers to sets, and prove all of their basic properties. Furthermore, that this can continue through more and more complicated material, and that there is never a real problem.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Bridge to abstract mathematics.Ralph W. Oberste-Vorth - 2012 - [Washington, DC]: Mathematical Association of America. Edited by Aristides Mouzakitis & Bonita A. Lawrence.
Reverse Mathematics.John Stillwell - 2024 - In Bharath Sriraman (ed.), Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Cham: Springer. pp. 1963-1988.
A Conversation about Numbers and Knowledge.Charles Sayward - 2002 - American Philosophical Quarterly 39 (3):275-287.
Set Theory and Logic.Robert Roth Stoll - 2012 - San Francisco and London: Courier Corporation.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#148,590)

6 months
1 (#1,515,053)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references