- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Progress Without Regress on the Dialectical Tier
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Only published works are available at libraries.
My notes
Similar books and articles
Commentary on James B. Freeman: “The Method of Relevant Variables, Objectivity, and Bias”.Andrei Moldovan - unknown
James B. Freeman,dialectics and the macrostructure of arguments. A theory of argument structure.Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - 1994 - Argumentation 8 (3):319-321.
James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises. [REVIEW]David Hitchcock - 2007 - Philosophical Inquiry 29 (1-2):168-175.
Review: Charles B. Daniels, James B. Freeman, Gerald W. Charlwood, Toward an Ontology of Number, Mind and Sign. [REVIEW]Linda Wetzel - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (3):1102-1104.
Why the Dialectical Tier is an Epistemic Animal.Scott Aikin - 2018 - In Steve Oswald (ed.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. College Publications. pp. 11-22.
How Critical is the Dialectical Tier?: Exploring the Critical Dimension in the Dialectical Tier.Qingyin Liang & Yun Xie - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):229-242.
Review of James B. Freeman, Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem. [REVIEW]Hans V. Hansen - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10).
The Regress Challenge, Infinitism and Rational Dialectics.Husein Inusah - 2020 - Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy (Philippine e-journal) 21 (2):223-240.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-04-02
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
2015-04-02
Downloads
13 (#288,494)
6 months
7 (#1,397,300)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Why the Dialectical Tier is an Epistemic Animal.Scott Aikin - 2018 - In Steve Oswald (ed.), Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg 2017. College Publications. pp. 11-22.
References found in this work
Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument.Ralph H. Johnson - 2000 - Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Dialectics: a controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge.Nicholas Rescher - 1977 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 12 (4):271-273.
Argumentation as dialectical.J. Anthony Blair & Ralph H. Johnson - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (1):41-56.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-ktvwr uwo