Minds and Machines 31 (4):595-616 (2021)

Authors
Paul Formosa
Macquarie University
Abstract
Social robots are robots that can interact socially with humans. As social robots and the artificial intelligence that powers them becomes more advanced, they will likely take on more social and work roles. This has many important ethical implications. In this paper, we focus on one of the most central of these, the impacts that social robots can have on human autonomy. We argue that, due to their physical presence and social capacities, there is a strong potential for social robots to enhance human autonomy as well as several ways they can inhibit and disrespect it. We argue that social robots could improve human autonomy by helping us to achieve more valuable ends, make more authentic choices, and improve our autonomy competencies. We also argue that social robots have the potential to harm human autonomy by instead leading us to achieve fewer valuable ends ourselves, make less authentic choices, decrease our autonomy competencies, make our autonomy more vulnerable, and disrespect our autonomy. Whether the impacts of social robots on human autonomy are positive or negative overall will depend on the design, regulation, and use we make of social robots in the future.
Keywords autonomy  social robots  artificial intelligence (AI)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11023-021-09579-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Thinking, Fast and Slow.Daniel Kahneman - 2011 - New York: New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1979 - Oxford University Press.
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.Harry Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
The Sources of Normativity.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 66 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Social Media and its Negative Impacts on Autonomy.Siavosh Sahebi & Paul Formosa - 2022 - Philosophy and Technology 35 (3):1-24.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Robots, Autonomy, and Responsibility.Raul Hakli & Pekka Mäkelä - 2016 - In Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov & Søren Schack Andersen (eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. pp. 145-154.
Negotiating Autonomy and Responsibility in Military Robots.Merel Noorman & Deborah G. Johnson - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (1):51-62.
Can Robots Be Teammates?Victoria Groom & Clifford Nass - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (3):483-500.
Black Boxes and Bias in AI Challenge Autonomy.Craig M. Klugman - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (7):33-35.
Changes of Representational AI Concepts Induced by Embodied Autonomy.Erich Prem - 2000 - Communication and Cognition-Artificial Intelligence 17 (3-4):189-208.
Establishing the Rules for Building Trustworthy AI.Luciano Floridi - 2019 - Nature Machine Intelligence 1:261-262.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-26

Total views
168 ( #70,952 of 2,520,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
121 ( #5,532 of 2,520,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes