Philosophy of History: A problem with some theories of Speculative philosophy of history and substantive philosophy of history

Abstract

Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Leslie White, Allen Johnson and Timothy Earle, and Stephen Sanderson all produced some of the more interesting theories of history, social change and cultural evolution but their theories have a common deficiency. None of them provide an ultimate explanation for social, cultural and historical change. This failure was rectified by J. S. Mill who suggested increasing human knowledge was the ultimate cause of social, cultural and historical change. However even Mill did not ask what caused the increasing human knowledge and why the knowledge had to be acquired in a particular order and how this could affect human history.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The speculative Philosophy of History.Ximeng An - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (6):552-564.
The Neo-Kantian Critiques of Karl Marx's Philosophy of History.Philip Donald Moran - 1981 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
“The End of History ” and the Fate of the Philosophy of History.Dun Zhang - 2010 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):631-651.
Progress.Gordon Graham - 1986 - Philosophy 61 (237):331 - 343.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-25

Downloads
334 (#61,590)

6 months
58 (#81,693)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references