Peirce and semiotic foundationalism

Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):728 - 744 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

: This paper articulates a view of the relation between cognition and being in Peirce's thought, especially derived from his early papers of 1868–69. Based on the rejection of intuitions, I argue that Peirce realized an isomorphic relation between cognition and being that functions as a semiotic foundation. I consider several challenges to these notions in the literature, including doubts about pansemioticism, foundationalism, and realism. In the end, I suggest that the semiotic foundation be thought of as a kind of transcendental, in several senses of that term

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is Wrong with Intuitions? An Assessment of a Peircean Criticism of Kant.Gabriele Gava - 2014 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (3):340.
The Peirce Seminar Papers: An Annual of Semiotic Analysis, Vol. I.Michael Shapiro - 1994 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 30 (3):703-709.
The Scope of Semiosis in Peirce's Philosophy.Felicia Ellen Kruse - 1989 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Another Interpretation of Peirce's Semiotic.Joseph Ransdell - 1976 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 12 (2):97 - 110.
Gérard Deledalle, "Charles S. Peirce, phénoménologue et sémioticien". [REVIEW]Guy Bouchard - 1989 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 25 (1):61.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
69 (#230,680)

6 months
7 (#592,867)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Forest
Canisius College

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references