How is the question 'is existence a predicate?' Relevant to the ontological argument?

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 64 (3):117 - 133 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is often said that the ontological argument fails because it wrongly treats existence as a first-level property or predicate. This has proved a controversial claim, and efforts to evaluate it are complicated by the fact that the words ‘existence is not a property/predicate’ have been used by philosophers to make at least three different negative claims: (a) one about a first-level phenomenon possessed by objects like horses, stones, you and me; (b) another about the logical form of assertions of existence; and (c) still another about a second-level phenomenon possessed by concepts when they are instantiated. I argue that only the last of these claims, originally voiced by Kant, is both plausible and relevant to the ontological argument. And I try to show that the relevance of the Kantian version comes from its providing the underlying justification for a different, and far less controversial, criticism of the ontological argument.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Millican on the Ontological Argument.Yujin Nagasawa - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):1027-1040.
Gassendi and Kant on existence.William Forgie - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):511 - 523.
The ontological argument and the devil.Yujin Nagasawa - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Alvin Plantinga on the ontological argument.William L. Rowe - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
Theological necessity.George N. Schlesinger - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (1):55-65.
Some Ontological Arguments.Hugh S. Chandler - 1993 - Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):18-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
184 (#107,214)

6 months
16 (#157,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant's principles of modality.Ian Blecher - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):932-944.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Language, truth and logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London,: V. Gollancz.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1940 - Open Court. Edited by David Pears.
Language, Truth, and Logic.A. J. Ayer - 1936 - Philosophy 23 (85):173-176.

View all 43 references / Add more references