Concepts: Core Readings

MIT Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Definitions.Jerry Fodor, Garrett A., F. Merrill, Edward Walker, Parkes C. T. & H. Cornelia - 1999 - In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 263--367.
That a Person May Grasp It?».What is A. Concept - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 305--333.
The role of theories in conceptual coherence.G. L. Murphy & D. L. Medin - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 289--316.
Is Semantics Possible? Hilary Putnam.Jerrold Katz - 1999 - In Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press. pp. 177.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-18

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Art Concept Pluralism.Christy Mag Uidhir & P. D. Magnus - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (1-2):83-97.
A semantic resolution of the paradox of analysis.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (3):189-205.
Why concepts can't be theories.Jack M. C. Kwong - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):309-325.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references