Applying Psychological Theories of Personality, Identity, and Intergroup Conflict to Radical Violence: A Case Study of Extremist Behavior

Abstract

This paper aims to address possible psychoanalytical explanations for the heinous acts in which terrorists, particularly ISIS, engage. It focuses on Harold D. Lasswell’s principles of the id, ego, and superego as well as Tajfel and Turner’s social identity theory. Within the framework of these two theories, relevant psychological and social psychological theories are discussed in order to explore a possible connection between the psyche of violent perpetrators and their actions. By exploring these connections, I find that there may be more nuanced psychological explanations for these violent acts, which could lead to new methods of weakening perceived biases, intergroup conflicts, and extremist behavior.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Multiple personality and personal identity.Mark T. Brown - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (4):435 – 447.
Uploading and Branching Identity.Michael A. Cerullo - 2015 - Minds and Machines 25 (1):17-36.
A sense of identity: Prolegomena to a social theory of personal identity.John D. GreenwooD - 1994 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (1):25–46.
"Narrow"-mindedness breeds inaction.David J. Buller - 1992 - Behavior and Philosophy 20 (1):59-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-04

Downloads
10 (#1,186,283)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays.P. F. Strawson - 1976 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 9 (3):185-188.
A model of egoistical relative deprivation.Faye Crosby - 1976 - Psychological Review 83 (2):85-113.

Add more references