What Does It Mean to Be Moral Equals? in advance

Social Theory and Practice (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops a novel theory of the meaning of moral equality. This theory has two original and significant implications: first, it shows—contra what is commonly held in the literature—that adults and children are not always each other’s equals; rather, the former are sometimes inferior and sometimes superior to the latter, depending on the interest at stake. Second, it reveals that human beings’ comparative moral status changes across time, and what matters is that they are each other’s equals at simultaneous segments of their lives.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Game theory: A practitioner's approach.Thomas C. Schelling - 2010 - Economics and Philosophy 26 (1):27-46.
The basis of equality.Geoffrey Cupit - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (1):105-125.
Basic equality and the site of egalitarian justice.Ian Carter - 2013 - Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):21-41.
Morals and Marx.Jan Narveson - 1983 - Dialogue 22 (3):523-534.
The Equals, the Equals Themselves, Equality, and the Equals Itself.Francesco Ademollo - 2007 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 18:1-20.
Moral Equality and Natural Inferiority.Laurence Thomas - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (3):379-404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-04-05

Downloads
22 (#733,560)

6 months
22 (#129,165)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Giacomo Floris
University of York
Riccardo Spotorno
Universita' degli Studi di Pavia

Citations of this work

Parental Love and Filial Equality.Giacomo Floris & Riccardo Spotorno - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references