Doing away with morgan’s canon

Mind and Language 23 (2):224–246 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Morgan’s Canon is a very widely endorsed methodological principle in animal psychology, believed to be vital for a rigorous, scientific approach to the study of animal cognition. In contrast I argue that Morgan’s Canon is unjustified, pernicious and unnecessary. I identify two main versions of the Canon and show that they both suffer from very serious problems. I then suggest an alternative methodological principle that captures all of the genuine methodological benefits that Morgan’s Canon can bring but suffers from none of its problems.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What use is Morgan's canon?Martin Montminy - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):399-414.
Do dolphins know their own minds?Derek Browne - 2004 - Biology and Philosophy 19 (4):633-53.
Real Logic is Nonmonotonic.Henry E. Kyburg - 2001 - Minds and Machines 11 (4):577-595.
Morgan’s Canon Revisited.Sean Allen-Hermanson - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (4):608-31.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
165 (#117,546)

6 months
26 (#113,656)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Simon Fitzpatrick
John Carroll University

Citations of this work

Animal Cognition and Human Values.Jonathan Birch - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (5):1026-1037.
In praise of animals.Rhys Borchert & Aliya R. Dewey - 2023 - Biology and Philosophy 38 (4):1-26.
Animal consciousness.Colin Allen & Michael Trestman - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations