Brian Huss [6]Brian Douglas Huss [1]
  1. Anthropomorphism, anthropectomy, and the null hypothesis.Kristin Andrews & Brian Huss - 2014 - Biology and Philosophy 29 (5):711-729.
    We examine the claim that the methodology of psychology leads to a bias in animal cognition research against attributing “anthropomorphic” properties to animals . This charge is examined in light of a debate on the role of folk psychology between primatologists who emphasize similarities between humans and other apes, and those who emphasize differences. We argue that while in practice there is sometimes bias, either in the formulation of the null hypothesis or in the preference of Type-II errors over Type-I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  2. Three challenges (and three replies) to the ethics of belief.Brian Huss - 2009 - Synthese 168 (2):249-271.
    In this paper I look at three challenges to the very possibility of an ethics of belief and then show how they can be met. The first challenge, from Thomas Kelly, says that epistemic rationality is not a form of instrumental rationality. If this claim is true, then it will be difficult to develop an ethics of belief that does not run afoul of naturalism. The second challenge is the Non-Voluntarism Argument, which holds that because we cannot believe at will (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  3.  86
    Cultural differences and the law of noncontradiction: Some criteria for further research.Brian Huss - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):375 – 389.
    Recent psychological research on the connection between culture and thought could have dire consequences for the idea that there are objective standards of reasoning and that meaningful cross-cultural discussion is possible. The problems are particularly acute if research shows that the Law of Noncontradiction (LNC) is not a universal of folk epistemology. It is extremely difficult to provide a non-circular justification for the LNC, and yet the LNC seems to act as a basic standard for reasoning in the West. If (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  4.  42
    Useful argumentation: a critique of the epistemological approach.Brian Huss - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (3):261-275.
    The main rationale for adopting the epistemological approach to argumentation seems to take the form of a criticism of the consensus theory. This criticism says that some instances of clearly bad argumentation count as acceptable instances of argumentation on the consensus theory. Supposedly, the epistemological approach does not have this problem. I suggest that the kind of normativity argumentation theorists should be concerned with is the normativity associated with giving real-world advice on how to partake in a critical discussion. I (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. Innovation and the grain problem.Anne Russon, Kristin Andrews & Brian Huss - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (4):422-423.
    Our concern is with Ramsey et al.'s method for identifying innovation. We show that either it yields false positives or the authors offer insufficient guidance for its application. To avoid these results, the authors need to modify the key or offer better guidelines for delineating input. Either choice requires addressing the processes that generate a behavior.
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
  6.  17
    Being Careful With Paralogisms: Pedagogical Concerns About Informal Fallacies.Brian Huss - unknown
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation