Daniel Fischer, Julia-Lena Reinermann, Georgina Guillen Mandujano, C. Tyler DesRoches, Sonali Diddi & Philip J. Vergragt
Journal of Cleaner Production 1 (300):126880 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Communication plays an important role in promoting sustainable consumption. Yet how the academic literature conceptualizes and relates communication and sustainable consumption remains poorly understood, despite growing research on communication in the context of sustainable consumption. This article presents the first comprehensive review of sustainable consumption communication (SCC) research as a young and evolving field of scholarly work. Through a systematic review and narrative synthesis of N = 67 peer-reviewed journal articles, we consolidated the research conducted in this field into four distinct types: communication as an approach to (1) behavior change, (2) self-empowerment, (3) systems change, and (4) reflection on current discourses and practices around sustainable consumption. Our findings reveal that most journal articles focus on incremental changes in individual consumer behavior (“weak” sustainable consumption) and employ communication as an intervention tool with little reference to communication science and theory. They also reveal integration challenges arising from the disciplinary diversity and fragmentation characteristic of the research field. Future research should develop shared frameworks and terminology, diversify its foci, synthesize relevant evidence, and innovate critical perspectives that go beyond one-way business-to-consumer communication. The results of our review can serve researchers engaged in sustainable consumption communication to better systematize their efforts and contribute more effectively to changing systems of consumption in the future.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann - 1966 - Anchor Books.
The Mathematical Theory of Communication.Claude E. Shannon & Warren Weaver - 1949 - University of Illinois Press.
In Two Minds: Dual-Process Accounts of Reasoning.Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (10):454-459.
Virtual Consumption, Sustainability & Human Well-Being.Kenneth R. Pike & C. Tyler DesRoches - 2020 - Environmental Values 29 (3):361-378.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Drivers of Sustainability and Consumer Well-Being: An Ethically-Based Examination of Religious and Cultural Values.Elizabeth A. Minton, Soo Jiuan Tan, Siok Kuan Tambyah & Richie L. Liu - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 175 (1):167-190.
“Sustainable Consumption” as a New Phase in a Governmentalization of Consumption.Yannick Rumpala - 2011 - Theory and Society 40 (6):669-699.
Do All Dimensions of Sustainable Consumption Lead to Psychological Well-Being? Empirical Evidence From Young Consumers.Isabel Carrero, Carmen Valor & Raquel Redondo - 2020 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33 (1):145-170.
Communication and Sustainable Agriculture: Building Agendas for Research and Practice. [REVIEW]Gerry Walter - 1992 - Agriculture and Human Values 9 (2):27-37.
Reasoning Claims for More Sustainable Food Consumption: A Capabilities Perspective.Lieske Voget-Kleschin - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (3):455-477.
Powering Sustainable Consumption: The Roles of Green Consumption Values and Power Distance Belief.Li Yan, Hean Tat Keh & Xiaoyu Wang - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (3):499-516.
The Influence of Advertising Appeals on Consumers’ Willingness to Participate in Sustainable Tourism Consumption.Hui Zhang, Yupeng Mou, Tao Wang & Jia Hu - 2020 - Complexity 2020:1-10.
Feelings That Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices.Paolo Antonetti & Stan Maklan - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 124 (1):117-134.
Pathways of Intercultural Communication Research. How Different Research Communities of Communication Scholars Deal with the Topic of Intercultural Communication.Stefanie Averbeck-Lietz - 2013 - Communications 38 (3):289-313.
Tying Up Loose Ends. Integrating Consumers’ Psychology Into a Broad Interdisciplinary Perspective on a Circular Sustainable Bioeconomy. [REVIEW]Katrin Beer, Laura Henn, Markus Will, Jakob Hildebrandt & Siegmar Otto - 2021 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (2):1-24.
Cultivating Carrots and Community: Local Organic Food and Sustainable Consumption.Gill Seyfang - 2007 - Environmental Values 16 (1):105-123.
Perspectives, Opportunities and Tensions in Ethical and Sustainable Luxury: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium.Victoria-Sophie Osburg, Iain Davies, Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 169 (2):201-210.
Translating Environmental Ideologies Into Action: The Amplifying Role of Commitment to Beliefs.Matthew A. Maxwell-Smith, Paul J. Conway, Joshua D. Wright & James M. Olson - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 153 (3):839-858.
“It’s Not Easy Living a Sustainable Lifestyle”: How Greater Knowledge Leads to Dilemmas, Tensions and Paralysis.Cristina Longo, Avi Shankar & Peter Nuttall - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 154 (3):759-779.
Reframing Individual Responsibility for Sustainable Consumption: Lessons From Environmental Justice and Ecological Citizenship.Lucie Middlemiss - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (2):147-167.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-04-13
Total views
180 ( #66,265 of 2,520,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #9,152 of 2,520,399 )
2021-04-13
Total views
180 ( #66,265 of 2,520,399 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #9,152 of 2,520,399 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads