Research Ethics Insurrection: Challenges to REB Criteria from the Social Sciences

The Meeting of the Minds 1 (1) (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Social Science relies heavily on the use of ethnography and other forms of qualitative study, research that may place the researcher as well as their subjects at significant ethical risk. In Canada, Research Ethics Boards are responsible for protecting research participants during these studies. But how much ethical oversight ought the Research Ethics Boards be entitled to? Are they repressing valuable qualitative studies or are the Social Science simply rebelling against new but appropriate control mechanisms not formerly applied to them? This paper evaluates how well the changes made in the TCPS 2 respond to the concerns of Social Scientists as presented in the literature.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reflections on My Experience in Human Research Ethics.K. G. Davey - 2009 - Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1-2):27-31.
Psychology, ethics, and research ethics boards.Donald Sharpe & Julie Ziemer - 2022 - Ethics and Behavior 32 (8):658-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-13

Downloads
87 (#194,952)

6 months
48 (#89,636)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steven J. Firth
University of Helsinki

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references