Intervention Debating Lebowitz: Is Class Conflict the Moral and Historical Element in the Value of Labour-Power?

Historical Materialism 16 (3):105-114 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Prompted by the debate over Michael Lebowitz's contributions on the relative absence of class struggle in Marx's Capital, this paper seeks to push analysis forward by closer examination of the notion of the value of labour-power. It does so by arguing that labour markets are structured, reproduced and transformed in complex and differentiated ways, whilst the moral and historical elements that make up the use-value interpretation of the value of labour-power also need to be addressed in a differentiated manner rather than as a fixed bundle.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,070

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Exploitation and Equality: Labour Power as a Non-Commodity.Henry Laycock - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15 (sup1):375-389.
Exploitation and Equality: Labour Power as a Non-Commodity.Henry Laycock - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15:375-389.
Automatic Subjects.Kevin Floyd - 2016 - Historical Materialism 24 (2):61-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
91 (#184,676)

6 months
8 (#505,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references