Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language By Stephen Finlay

Analysis 80 (1):99-101 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a short precis of my 2014 book Confusion of Tongues: A Theory of Normative Language, accompanying my Reply to Worsnip, Dowell, and Koehn in the same volume.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-11-28

Downloads
182 (#20,259)

6 months
46 (#334,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Finlay
Australian Catholic University

Citations of this work

Rules of Use.Indrek Reiland - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (2):566-583.
Flexible Contextualism about Deontic Modals: A Puzzle about Information-Sensitivity.J. L. Dowell - 2013 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 56 (2-3):149-178.
The sense of incredibility in ethics.Nicholas Laskowski - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (1):93-115.
Normative reasons as good bases.Alex Gregory - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (9):2291-2310.
The Reasons Aggregation Theorem.Ralph Wedgwood - 2022 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics 12:127-148.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Moral realism.Peter Railton - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):163-207.
Choosing Normative Concepts.Matti Eklund - 2017 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conceptual Ethics I.Alexis Burgess & David Plunkett - 2013 - Philosophy Compass 8 (12):1091-1101.
Lecture on Ethics.Ludwig Wittgenstein (ed.) - 2014 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

View all 20 references / Add more references