Objectivity, Political Order, and Responsibility in Max Weber’s Thought

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 30 (3):256-293 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Weber’s conception of politics has long been interpreted in relativistic and “agonistic” terms. Such interpretations neglect Weber’s notion of “objectivity” as well as the complex links between politics as “community,” on the one hand, and as “value sphere,” on the other. Seen against this backdrop, Berufpolitik becomes a balancing act in which the pursuit of subjective values is objectively constrained not only by the ethic of responsibility, but more generally by the political imperative to safeguard the preconditions for communal order and, in late modernity, of liberal freedoms. Without them, neither the objective “clarity” generated by science nor the subjective political commitments based on “clear vision” would be possible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,435

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Max Weber's liberal nationalism.S. H. Kim - 2002 - History of Political Thought 23 (3):432-457.
Max Weber's Politics of Civil Society.Sung Ho Kim - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weber: political writings.Max Weber - 1994 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Peter Lassman & Ronald Speirs.
Was Max Weber Wrong About Westminster?K. Palonen - 2014 - History of Political Thought 35 (3):519-537.
The Structure of Max Weber's Ethic of Responsibility.Bradley E. Starr - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (3):407 - 434.
Objectivity as responsibility.Lisa M. Heldke & Stephen H. Kellert - 1995 - Metaphilosophy 26 (4):360-378.
Max Weber: made in the USA?Sven Eliaeson - 2005 - Etica E Politica 7 (2):1-30.
Law, Decision, Necessity: Shifting the Burden of Responsibility.Johanna Jacques - 2015 - In Matilda Arvidsson, Leila Brännström & Panu Minkkinen (eds.), The Contemporary Relevance of Carl Schmitt: Law, Politics, Theology. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 107-119.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-14

Downloads
19 (#788,257)

6 months
5 (#630,279)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics.Robert Shaver - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):458.
Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.

View all 23 references / Add more references