Radical Philosophy Review 21 (2):271-298 (2018)

Andrew Feenberg
Simon Fraser University
Marcuse argues that society must be evaluated in terms of its unrealized potentialities. Potentialities are formulated by the imagination, which has an essential cognitive function in revealing what things might be. Utopian thinking, thinking that transcends the given facts toward their potentialities, is thus rational in Marcuse’s view. His explanation for this claim draws on Hegel, Marx, and phenomenology. With Freud, Marcuse elaborates the historical limits and possibilities of the imagination as an expression of Eros. Utopia is the historical realization in a refashioned world of the rational contents of the imagination.
Keywords Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1388-4441
DOI 10.5840/radphilrev201891190
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):702-720.
Marcuse the Lover.V. Lloyd - 2013 - Télos 2013 (165):9-22.
Marcuse and the "New Science".Steven Vogel - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge. pp. 240--6.


Added to PP index

Total views
11 ( #852,788 of 2,507,897 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes