Radical Philosophy Review 21 (2):271-298 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Marcuse argues that society must be evaluated in terms of its unrealized potentialities. Potentialities are formulated by the imagination, which has an essential cognitive function in revealing what things might be. Utopian thinking, thinking that transcends the given facts toward their potentialities, is thus rational in Marcuse’s view. His explanation for this claim draws on Hegel, Marx, and phenomenology. With Freud, Marcuse elaborates the historical limits and possibilities of the imagination as an expression of Eros. Utopia is the historical realization in a refashioned world of the rational contents of the imagination.
|
Keywords | Social and Political Philosophy |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1388-4441 |
DOI | 10.5840/radphilrev201891190 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Critical Theory and the Question of Technology: The Frankfurt School Revisited.Gerard Delanty & Neal Harris - 2021 - Thesis Eleven 166 (1):88-108.
Form, Technique and Liberation: Schiller’s Influence on Marcuse’s Philosophy of Technology.Juliano Bonamigo Ferreira de Souza - 2020 - Human Affairs 30 (4):535-544.
Similar books and articles
The Essential Marcuse: Selected Writings of Philosopher and Social Critic Herbert Marcuse.Herbert Marcuse, Andrew Feenberg & William Leiss - 2008 - Human Studies 31 (2):233-239.
From the Question Concerning Technology to the Quest for a Democratic Technology: Heidegger, Marcuse, Feenberg.Iain Thomson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):203 – 215.
Heidegger and Marcuse : The Catastrophe and Redemption of Technology.Andrew Feenberg - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
Feenberg and STS: Counter-Reflections on Bridging the Gap.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):702-720.
Walking on Two Legs: On The Very Possibility of a Heideggerian Marxism.Ian Angus - 2005 - Human Studies 28 (3):335-352.
Marcuse and the "New Science".Steven Vogel - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge. pp. 240--6.
Jurgen Habermas Ed., "Antworten Auf Marcuse"; Jean-Michel Palmier, "Presentation de Marcuse"; Tito Perlini, "Che Cosa Ha Veramente Detto Marcuse"; Dieter Ulle and N. Motroshlova Et Al., "E' Rivoluzionaria la Dottrina di Marcuse?". [REVIEW]Paul Piccone - 1969 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 3.
Herbert Marcuse. La Ascensión Del Totalitarismo En la Sociedad Postindustrial.Jesús Díaz Labarca - 2002 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 7 (18):9-34.
Marcuse's Deep-Social Ecology and the Future of Utopian Environmentalism.Andrew Light - 2004 - In John Abromeit & W. Mark Cobb (eds.), Herbert Marcuse: A Critical Reader. Routledge.
Book Review:Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics, and Utopia. Herbert Marcuse; An Exposition and a Polemic. Herbert Marcuse, Alasdair MacIntyre; The Meaning of Marcuse. Robert W. Marks. [REVIEW]Paul Johnson - 1971 - Ethics 81 (4):350-.
Can We Truly Love That Which is Fleeting? The Problem of Time in Marcuse's Eros and Civilization.Brian Lightbody - 2010 - Florida Philosophical Review (1):25-42.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-09-14
Total views
11 ( #852,788 of 2,507,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )
2018-09-14
Total views
11 ( #852,788 of 2,507,897 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,897 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads