Harnessing Artificial Intelligence-Powered Search Engines for the Literature Review Process

Abstract

Literature reviews are an essential part of research, and they require a significant amount of time and effort to be able to search through the millions of academic papers both online and physically. However, with the advent of AI-powered search engines, the process of conducting literature reviews has become more efficient and effective. AI-powered search engines use machine learning algorithms to analyze large volumes of data and provide researchers with relevant and accurate information in a matter of seconds. The importance of AI-powered search engines in literature reviews cannot be overstated. They help researchers save time, improve the accuracy and relevance of their results, and provide comprehensive results that traditional literature review methods may miss. The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a comprehensive guide on how to leverage AI-powered search engines for the literature review process. It discusses the advantages of using AI-powered search engines, how to choose the right search engine, tips for using them effectively and avoid pitfalls in the use of these tools.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,891

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Answering machines: how to (epistemically) evaluate a search engine.Jessie Munton - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Ethical subjectification and search engines: ethics reconsidered.Tobias Blanke - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 3:34-38.
Search engines and the public use of reason.Dag Elgesem - 2008 - Ethics and Information Technology 10 (4):233-242.
Search engines, personal information and the problem of privacy in public.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - International Review of Information Ethics 3:39-45.
The Myth of Automated Meaning.James Caufield - 2006 - International Review of Information Ethics 5:09.
Web search engines and distributed assessment systems.Christophe Heintz - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (2):387-409.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-03-15

Downloads
1 (#1,919,186)

6 months
1 (#1,722,086)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references