Genetic Justice Must Track Genetic Complexity

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1):45-53 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. What values and principles should inform the regulation of new human genetic technologies? To adequately answer this question we need an account of genetic justice. That is, an account of what constitutes a fair distribution of genetic endowments that influence our expected life-time acquisition of natural primary goods. These are goods that every rational person has an interest in. The decisions we now make regarding the regulation of human genetic technologies will determine how quickly and effectively these benefits are brought into existence, as well as who receives these benefits. In this paper I argue that a necessary condition of a defensible account of genetic justice is that it must track genetic complexity. Genetic complexity encompasses phenomena such as polygenetic traits, gene-gene interactions and complex environmental influences. More specifically, I argue that pluralistic prioritarianism is a theoretical position well-suited for tracking genetic complexity



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

60 (#268,242)

6 months
8 (#362,344)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Colin Farrelly
Queen's University

Citations of this work

On the Very Idea of Genetic Justice.Michele Loi - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):64-77.
On the Very Idea of Genetic Justice.Michele Loi - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (1):64-77.
Normative Theorizing about Genetics.Colin Farrelly - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (4):408-419.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references