Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS): The Case of Spatial and Abstract Relations

Metaphor and Symbol 38 (1):1-22 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article tackles the tricky problem of identifying metaphors in language that includes prepositions. We demonstrate how the Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (PIMS) reflected and evoked by linguistic expressions in discourse, Johansson Falck & Okonski, accepted) can be used to identify metaphorical relations reflected in language. The scenes evoked correspond to conceptualizations that are directly attested by the specific linguistic constructions in the sentences under analysis. We present two studies that test the reliability of the procedure and the sensitivity of the tool for prepositions. Results show that PIMS provides a simple procedure that increases both reliability and sensitivity for prepositional constructions. By focusing on the scenes evoked by linguistic constructions, the procedure highlights the contextual meanings of the constructions and the specific experiences that they code.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Imposed Metaphoricity.Roy Porat & Yeshayahu Shen - 2015 - Metaphor and Symbol 30 (2):77-94.
Inferring Content: Metaphor and Malapropism.Zsófia Zvolenszky - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 55 (44):163–182.
Lexico-grammatical alignment in metaphor construal.Jenny Lederer - 2019 - Cognitive Linguistics 30 (1):165-203.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-09

Downloads
22 (#1,044,566)

6 months
4 (#963,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations