Humean Contiguity

History of Philosophy Quarterly 18 (3):279 - 296 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We argue that Hume was wrong to identify constant conjunction in time as the sole associative principle responsible for belief. On principles that can be grounded on his own account, constant contiguity in space ought to produce the same effect. We close by examining some of the ways in which a recognition of the influence of contiguity relations might have assisted Hume in resolving problems that otherwise arise with his accounts of causality and objectivity.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
20 (#760,329)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Induction and inference to the best explanation.Ruth Weintraub - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 166 (1):203-216.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references