Ethical behaviours in organizations: Directed by the formal or informal systems? [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 14 (2):133 - 143 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Past research has focused on individual culpability with the assumption that individuals will further their own self interest over that of the organization, given an appropriate opportunity. In contrast, this research shifts the focus from individual motivation to the influence of the formal and informal control systems of organizations on ethical behaviours. An open-ended interview approach was used to collect data. It was found that pressures within the informal system were the dominant influence in the resolution of ethical issues. The dominance of the informal system, however, varies according to the economic position of the organization.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,060

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Managing ethics in business organizations: social scientific perspectives.Linda Klebe Treviño - 2003 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford Business Books. Edited by Gary R. Weaver.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#208,053)

6 months
8 (#836,731)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Moral mazes: the world of corporate managers.Robert Jackall - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The challenge of ethical behavior in organizations.Ronald R. Sims - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (7):505 - 513.
A conceptual model of corporate moral development.R. Eric Reidenbach & Donald P. Robin - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (4):273 - 284.
An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers.Robbin Derry - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (11):855 - 862.
The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations.R. Sims Ronald - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (7):505-513.

View all 10 references / Add more references