Classical Empiricism

In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 102–119 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter on classical empiricism is divided into three sections, namely, absolutism, idealism, and memory. Presentism poses a particular problem for the empiricist view that the idea of time arises from people's experience of the succession of their ideas. The view that time passes independently of the succession of ideas was shared by canonically empiricist philosophers, such as Gassendi, Locke, and Newton. The idea of time arises from a compound impression that consists of successively disposed simple impressions – impressions that may be identical in all respects but for their manner of disposition, and that may be disposed on either side of an unoccupied gap. People's experience is not confined to the present moment. The truly radical implication is that the past is not destroyed. It persists, not into the present by way of a trace or echo, but in the past, which continues to be visible to consciousness.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some Virtues of Classical Empiricism.Anil Gupta - 2006 - In Empiricism and Experience. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press USA.
VIII. Classical Empiricism.Paul K. Feyerabend - 1971 - In John W. Davis & Robert E. Butts (eds.), The Methodological Heritage of Newton. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 150-170.
Hurford's partial vindication of classical empiricism.Fiona Cowie - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):289-290.
Hume on Manners of Disposition and the Ideas of Space and Time.Lorne Falkenstein - 1997 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 79 (2):179-201.
The Reality of the Present.Franklin Curtis Mason - 1998 - Dissertation, Purdue University
The Perception of Time.Barry Dainton - 2013 - In Adrian Bardon & Heather Dyke (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Time. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 387–409.
Can We Perceive the Past?E. J. Green - forthcoming - In Lynn Nadel & Sara Aronowitz (eds.), Space, Time, and Memory. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-15

Downloads
11 (#1,145,893)

6 months
10 (#384,490)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorne Falkenstein
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Elements in Hume.Matias Slavov - 2016 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 14 (3):275-296.
Hume's Dual Criteria for Memory.Maité Cruz - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (2):336-358.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references