Against body exceptionalism: A reply to Eyal

Utilitas 21 (2):246-248 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is hard to do justice, in a short reply, to Eyal's excellent review. Accordingly, I will focus on what I take to be its central claim – namely that I fail to give proper consideration to the extent to which the forced extraction of body parts undermines individuals' opportunities for self-respect. According to Eyal, ‘body exceptionalism’ can be defended on the following grounds: ‘People usually see trespass into a person and into objects they associate with a person – especially into a person's body – as utterly disrespectful towards that person and her autonomy’ . And later: ‘Whether or not organ confiscation is truly disrespectful . . . its widespread and intractable perception as a humiliating violation counts heavily against it, because it can thwart opportunities for self-respect’

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-28

Downloads
140 (#131,841)

6 months
13 (#278,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Cecile Fabre
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Prosthetic embodiment.Sean Aas - 2019 - Synthese 198 (7):6509-6532.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references