Comparative and Continental Philosophy 1 (2):171-179 (2009)
Abstract |
To what extent can philosophy speak to and write about what is most fundamental to itself? This essay sorts through aspects of the problem of Plato's alleged "unwritten doctrine." The essay begins by moving back to Plato's teacher and the non-doctrinal investigations of Socrates, which are grounded in the positing of hypotheses and dialogic questioning. Following this move, the essay turns forward to Plotinus's later, more systematic presentations where the use of terms like “the one” and “the good” are not only beyond being but “are” non-objects, unable to be intuited by the intellect. These terms serve as pointers to “what” can only be realized through the soul's blissful union with its non-objective source and ground
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2010 |
DOI | 10.1558/ccp.v1i2.171 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Platons Ungeschriebene Lehre: Studien Zur Systematischen Und Geschichtlichen Begründung der Wissenschaften in der Platonischen Schule.Glenn R. Morrow - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (4):531-534.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Socrates in the Platonic Dialogues.Catherine Osborne - 2006 - Philosophical Investigations 29 (1):1–21.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-10
Total views
51 ( #224,446 of 2,520,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,895 )
2010-08-10
Total views
51 ( #224,446 of 2,520,895 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,895 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads