Linnaean ranks: Vestiges of a bygone era

Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S305-S315 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We tend to think that there are different types of biological taxa: some taxa are species, others are genera, while others are families. Linnaeus gave us his ranks in 1731. Biological theory has changed since Linnaeus’s time. Nevertheless, the vast majority of biologists still assign Linnaean ranks to taxa, even though that practice is at odds with evolutionary theory and even though it causes a number of practical problems. The Linnaean ranks should be abandoned and alternative methods for displaying the hierarchical relations of taxa should be adopted

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Necessary propertes and linnaean essentialism.Berent Enç - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):83-102.
Some problems with the linnaean hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):186-205.
The evolution of the linnaean hierarchy.Marc Ereshefsky - 1997 - Biology and Philosophy 12 (4):493-519.
Categoricity and ranks.Jürgen Saffe - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1379-1392.
A Survey of Ranking Theory.Wolfgang Spohn - 2009 - In Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of belief. London: Springer.
Vestiges of the natural history of creation and other evolutionary writings.Robert Chambers - 1844 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by James A. Secord.
Names, numbers and indentations: A guide to post-linnaean taxonomy.M. Ereshefsky - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 32 (2):361-383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#159,221)

6 months
6 (#510,232)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marc Ereshefsky
University of Calgary

Citations of this work

Species are not uniquely real biological entities.Brent D. Mishler - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 110--122.
Anthropocentricisms in cladograms.Hanno Sandvik - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (4):425-440.

Add more citations