Review of Millikan, Ruth Garrett, Language: A Biological Model [Book Review]

Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (5) (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ruth Mil­likan is one of the most inter­est­ing and influ­en­tial philoso­phers alive. Her work is also hard to pen­e­trate. In this review, I try to present and assess her work on the nature of lan­guage, which is col­lected in this anthol­ogy. I also crit­i­cize her analy­sis of “nat­ural con­ven­tion” as well as her dis­cus­sion of illo­cu­tion­ary acts.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language: A Biological Model.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Millikan's Historical Kinds.Mohan Matthen - 2013 - In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and her critics. Malden, MA: Wiley. pp. 135-154.
Teleosemantics without natural selection.Marshall Abrams - 2005 - Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):97-116.
A proper understanding of Millikan.Justine Kingsbury - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (40):23-40.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
418 (#47,375)

6 months
117 (#34,482)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian Epstein
Tufts University

Citations of this work

Walking the tightrope: Unrecognized conventions and arbitrariness.Megan Henricks Stotts - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (8):867-887.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references