Abstract

The article examines the relations between Estonian dramaturgy and the rapidly renewing ‘post-dramatic’ theatre of the 2000s from two viewpoints: new text creation practices and how the poetics of texts have changed. In the 2000s, the share of original dramaturgy increased sharply: in the 1990s, about 25% of new productions were based on Estonian material, whereas by 2010 the percentage was 45%. A quite popular form was ‘director-dramaturgy’, which had started as early as the 1970s. Theatre criticism took up the concept of author’s theatre, also emphasising one person’s control over both the text and directing the production. In this case, text-creation is processual: a text takes shape according to the author’s directorial strategies and the interaction between the director and the actors. The collective creation of texts and productions should be examined separately; this emerged powerfully in the 2000s and was primarily connected with smaller theatres. Quite often, text and production are created through the method of devising; the article tackles this approach on the basis of productions by Theatre NO99. In the case of group work, the issue of the text’s authorship is rather complicated, as it is a cooperative practice, where the authors’ functions are not clearly differentiated. The blending of text creation with theatre process influences the poetics of drama texts in various ways. The most important changes are as follows: a) a dominant or constituting role can be assumed by non-verbal means of theatre; the text written for them serves only as a general indication ; b) there is an instability in the text, which varies in different performances, resulting from improvisation as a strategy of text creation; c) a shift from the fictional to the factual, producing the impression of authenticity, e.g. by means of documentary material ; d) monologue storytelling, usually autobiographical and documentary stories ; e) rewriting of classics continued. During the 2000s, the changes in Estonian dramaturgy have been more cutting than in the 1990s, a result of the tight intertwining of dramaturgic and directorial practices and strategies. In a wider perspective, the spread of new practices constitutes one part of the synchronisation of Estonian theatre with Western theatre, where the paradigm of post-dramatic theatre emerges. Legitimising post-dramatic theatre texts in the field of literature occurs more on an institutional basis and is based on individual cases rather than according to literary criteria.