All non-real worlds provide exploration: Evidence from developmental psychology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e290 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

While Dubourg and Baumard argue that predisposition toward exploration draws us to fictional environments, they fail to answer their titular question: “Why Imaginary Worlds?” Research in pretend play, psychological distancing, and theatre shows that being “imaginary” (i.e., any type of unreal, rather than only fantastically unreal) makes exploration of any fictional world profoundly different than that of real-life unfamiliar environments.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Fictional Worlds Are Created.Deena Skolnick Weisberg - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (8):462-470.
Imaginary bodies and worlds.Kathleen Lennon - 2004 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):107 – 122.
This Is Not Here.Katherine J. Morris - 2002 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (3):281-283.
Fiction and Fictionalism.R. M. Sainsbury - 2009 - New York: Routledge.
What Belongs in a Fictional World?Deena Skolnick Weisberg & Joshua Goodstein - 2009 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 9 (1-2):69-78.
How remote are fictional worlds from the real world?Kendall L. Walton - 1978 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37 (1):11-23.
Is factuality a matter of content?Gregory Currie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):763-763.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-09

Downloads
4 (#1,644,260)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations