Soziobiologie und Ethik

Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 33 (1):162-175 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author discusses the question, if sociobiology can be relevant for the conceptual foundations of ethics. She comes to the conclusion that sociobiology cannot reduce the meaning of moral terms to that of sociobiological discourse, but that sociobiology might nevertheless be able to shed light on the complex phenomenon of morality by demonstrating the presence of traces of our evolutionary past in our behavior. Thereby sociobiology might be relevant for elucidating the relation between »can« and »ought«, that is, for the question of practicability of moral norms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Sociobiology.Harmon Holcomb & Jason M. Byron - 2005 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sociobiology and Moral Discourse.Loyal Rue - 1998 - Zygon 33 (4):525-533.
Sociobiology, Sex, and Science.Harmon R. Holcomb Iii - 1993 - State University of New York Press.
Sociobiology.Robert A. Wilson - 2014 - Eugenics Archives.
Sociobiology Sex and Science.Harmon R. Holcomb Iii & Douglas Allchin - 1997 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 19 (3):423.
Bioaltruism reconsidered.Bart Voorzanger - 1994 - Biology and Philosophy 9 (1):75-84.
Is sociobiology a new paradigm?Michael Ruse - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (1):98-104.
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?R. Paul Thompson - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:363 - 370.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-11

Downloads
11 (#1,070,627)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references