Groups in Schutz: The Concrete Meaning Structure of the Socio-Historical World

PhaenEx 6 (1):1-11 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Schutz is well-known for his social-psychological description of how an individual self relates to “consociates,” “contemporaries,” “predecessors,” and “successors,” but there are rudiments as well in his oeuvre of an account of groups or collectivities that can be developed analogously to show how groups can share space and time like consociates, share only time like contemporaries, and not share time (but could share space) like a group in relation to its dead predecessors and not-yet founded successors. This aspect deserves exploration because individuals apart from their memberships in voluntary and existential groups are abstract and the concrete has of course ontological priority

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
33 (#471,604)

6 months
6 (#701,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Photography and evidence: reflections on the imagistic violence.Paul Marinescu - forthcoming - Continental Philosophy Review:1-16.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references