Thomson on distress

Ethics 106 (1):112-119 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Judith Jarvis Thomson holds that we have a right not be be caused distressful feelingsÑbut only if they are "non-belief- mediated"; we have no right not to be caused belief-mediated distress. I suggest that this view is highly counter-intuitive; and I argue that it is not supported by Thomson's arguments which, if they serve to exclude belief-mediated feelings would equally serve to exclude non-belief-mediated ones. I also suggest that some of the work that Thomson wants this distinction to do can be done in other ways.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
49 (#324,348)

6 months
17 (#148,261)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Harm, sovereignty, and prohibition.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Legal Theory 17 (1):35-65.
Virtual killing.Carl David Https://Orcidorg191X Mildenberger - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (1):185-203.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references