The Crisis of New Labor and Alinsky’s Legacy: Some Questions, Comments, and Problems

Politics and Society 43 (3):443-446 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This comment questions Jane McAlevey’s attempt to move from a participant observation of one organizing campaign to broad generalizations about the failure of “New Labor.” It challenges the ideal type that she constructs by considering aspects of another “new labor” local, and problematizes her conception of interests as they pertain to both workers and unions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Religious Ethics of Labor.Fred Glennon & Vincent Lloyd - 2017 - Journal of Religious Ethics 45 (2):217-229.
Philosophy and the Labor Market in Romania.Sandu Frunza & Mihaela Frunza - 2010 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 9 (25):28-58.
Labor markets.Andrzej Klimczuk - 2017 - In Bryan S. Turner (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1--5.
A Normative Argument for Independent Voice and Labor Unions.Cedric E. Dawkins - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 155 (4):1153-1165.
Sweatshops, labor rights, and comparative advantage.Gary Chartier - 2008 - Oregon Review of International Law 10 (1):149--188.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
4 (#1,618,541)

6 months
1 (#1,463,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references